Mardan, Amir ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-1259; Blouin, Martin; Fabien‐Ouellet, Gabriel; Giroux, Bernard ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-2759; Vergniault, Christophe et Gendreau, Jeremy (2024). A fine‐tuning workflow for automatic first‐break picking with deep learning. Near Surface Geophysics , vol. 22 , nº 5. pp. 539-552. DOI: 10.1002/nsg.12316.
Ce document n'est pas hébergé sur EspaceINRS.Résumé
First‐break picking is an essential step in seismic data processing. For reliable results, first arrivals should be picked by an expert. This is a time‐consuming procedure and subjective to a certain degree, leading to different results for different operators. In this study, we have used a U‐Net architecture with residual blocks to perform automatic first‐break picking based on deep learning. Focusing on the effects of weight initialization on first‐break picking, we conduct this research by using the weights of a pre‐trained network that is used for object detection on the ImageNet dataset. The efficiency of the proposed method is tested on two real datasets. For both datasets, we pick manually the first breaks for less than 10 of the seismic shots. The pre‐trained network is fine‐tuned on the picked shots, and the rest of the shots are automatically picked by the neural network. It is shown that this strategy allows to reduce the size of the training set, requiring fine‐tuning with only a few picked shots per survey. Using random weights and more training epochs can lead to a lower training loss, but such a strategy leads to overfitting as the test error is higher than the one of the pre‐trained network. We also assess the possibility of using a general dataset by training a network with data from three different projects that are acquired with different equipment and at different locations. This study shows that if the general dataset is created carefully it can lead to more accurate first‐break picking; otherwise, the general dataset can decrease the accuracy. Focusing on near‐surface geophysics, we perform traveltime tomography and compare the inverted velocity models based on different first‐break picking methodologies. The results of the inversion show that the first breaks obtained by the pre‐trained network lead to a velocity model that is closer to the one obtained from the inversion of expert‐picked first breaks.
Type de document: | Article |
---|---|
Mots-clés libres: | environmental; hydrogeology; near-surface; tomography; traveltime |
Centre: | Centre Eau Terre Environnement |
Date de dépôt: | 08 nov. 2024 19:59 |
Dernière modification: | 08 nov. 2024 19:59 |
URI: | https://espace.inrs.ca/id/eprint/15958 |
Gestion Actions (Identification requise)
Modifier la notice |