Dépôt numérique
RECHERCHER

Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study

Téléchargements

Téléchargements par mois depuis la dernière année

Plus de statistiques...

Nha Hong, Quan; Pluye, Pierre; Fàbregues, Sergi; Bartlett, Gillian; Boardman, Felicity; Cargo, Margaret; Dagenais, Pierre; Gagnon, Marie-Pierre; Griffiths, Frances; Nicolau, Belinda; O'Cathain, Alicia; Rousseau, Marie-Claude; Vedel, Isabelle (2019). Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study Journal of Clinical Epidemiology . p. 49-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008. (Sous Presse)

[img] Microsoft Word (Supplementary file 1. Reference list) - Matériel supplémentaire
Télécharger (52kB)

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) was developed for critically appraising different study designs. This study aimed to improve the content validity of three of the five categories of studies in the MMAT by identifying relevant methodological criteria for appraising the quality of qualitative, survey, and mixed methods studies.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: First, we performed a literature review to identify critical appraisal tools and extract methodological criteria. Second, we conducted a two-round modified e-Delphi technique. We asked three method-specific panels of experts to rate the relevance of each criterion on a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS: A total of 383 criteria were extracted from 18 critical appraisal tools and a literature review on the quality of mixed methods studies, and 60 were retained. In the first and second rounds of the e-Delphi, 73 and 56 experts participated, respectively. Consensus was reached for six qualitative criteria, eight survey criteria, and seven mixed methods criteria. These results led to modifications of eight of the 11 MMAT (version 2011) criteria. Specifically, we reformulated two criteria, replaced four, and removed two. Moreover, we added six new criteria.

CONCLUSION: Results of this study led to improve the content validity of this tool, revise it, and propose a new version (MMAT version 2018).

Type de document: Article
Mots-clés libres: Delphi technique; Mixed methods research; Qualitative research; Quality appraisal; Surveys; Systematic review
Centre: Centre INRS-Institut Armand Frappier
Date de dépôt: 22 nov. 2019 06:29
Dernière modification: 22 nov. 2019 06:29
URI: http://espace.inrs.ca/id/eprint/8210

Actions (Identification requise)

Modifier la notice Modifier la notice